Site Feedback

Title 5

Displaying title 5, up to date as of 10/06/2026. Title 5 was last amended 10/05/2026.
There has been one change in the last two weeks to § 1201.56.
New Finding Aids are now available on eCFR.gov. The Parallel Table of Authorities, Subject Index, and Agency-prepared Indexes are now online! Learn more
eCFR Content

The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is the official legal print publication containing the codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the departments and agencies of the Federal Government. The Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) is a continuously updated online version of the CFR. It is not an official legal edition of the CFR.

Learn more about the eCFR, its status, and the editorial process.

§ 1201.56 Burden and degree of proof.

(a) Applicability. This section does not apply to the following types of appeals which are covered by § 1201.57:

(1) An individual right of action appeal under the Whistleblower Protection Act, 5 U.S.C. 1221;

(2) An appeal under the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act, 5 U.S.C. 3330a(d);

(3) An appeal under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. 4324, in which the appellant alleges discrimination or retaliation in violation of 38 U.S.C. 4311; and

(4) An appeal under 5 CFR 353.304, in which the appellant alleges a failure to restore, improper restoration of, or failure to return following a leave of absence.

(b) Burden and degree of proof —

(1) Agency. Under 5 U.S.C. 7701(c)(1), and subject to the exceptions stated in paragraph (c) of this section, the agency bears the burden of proof and its action must be sustained only if:

(i) It is brought under 5 U.S.C. 4303 or 5 U.S.C. 5335 and is supported by substantial evidence (as defined in § 1201.4(p)); or

(ii) It is brought under any other provision of law or regulation and is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (as defined in § 1201.4(q)).

(2) Appellant.

(i) The appellant has the burden of proof, by a preponderance of the evidence (as defined in § 1201.4(q)), with respect to:

(A) Issues of jurisdiction, except for cases in which the appellant asserts a violation of his right to reemployment following military duty under 38 U.S.C. 4312-4314;

(B) The timeliness of the appeal; and

(C) Affirmative defenses.

(ii) In appeals from final decisions of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) involving retirement benefits, if the appellant filed the application, the appellant has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence (as defined in § 1201.4(q)), entitlement to the benefits.

(3) Penalty determination.

(i) This paragraph (b)(3) applies only to appeals filed under 5 U.S.C. 7513.

(ii) The agency's choice of penalty is entitled to substantial deference. The Board will review a penalty only to determine whether it is within the tolerable limits of reasonableness in light of the charges sustained under paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section. This determination is based upon the totality of the circumstances relating to the efficiency of the service, on a case-by-case basis.

(iii) If the Board sustains all of the agency's charges, the Board will determine whether the penalty imposed by the agency is within the tolerable limits of reasonableness, and will not substitute its judgment for the judgment of the deciding official.

(A) If the Board makes an affirmative finding in this regard, the Board will sustain the agency's action.

(B) If the Board makes a negative finding in this regard, the Board may mitigate the agency's original penalty to the maximum reasonable penalty.

(iv) If the Board sustains fewer than all of the agency's charges, the Board may mitigate the agency's original penalty to the maximum reasonable penalty so long as the agency did not indicate either in its final decision, or during proceedings before the Board, that it desired that a lesser penalty be imposed if the Board did not sustain all of its charges.

(A) If the agency so indicated, the Board may:

(1) Impose the lesser penalty the agency indicated it would have imposed; or

(2) If the Board cannot discern what that penalty would have been, accord the agency an opportunity to institute a lesser penalty.

(B) If the agency did not so indicate, the Board may:

(1) Mitigate the agency's original penalty to the maximum reasonable penalty; or

(2) Accord the agency an opportunity to institute a lesser penalty.

(c) Affirmative defenses of the appellant. Under 5 U.S.C. 7701(c)(2), the Board is required to reverse the action of the agency, even where the agency has met the evidentiary standard stated in paragraph (b) of this section, if the appellant:

(1) Shows harmful error in the application of the agency's procedures in arriving at its decision (as defined in § 1201.4(r));

(2) Shows that the decision was based on any prohibited personnel practice described in 5 U.S.C. 2302(b); or

(3) Shows that the decision was not in accordance with law.

(d) Administrative judge. The administrative judge will inform the parties of the proof required as to the issues of jurisdiction, the timeliness of the appeal, and affirmative defenses.

[80 FR 4496, Jan. 28, 2015, as amended at 89 FR 72961, Sept. 9, 2024; 91 FR 56574, Sept. 3, 2026]