Home
gpo.gov
govinfo.gov

e-CFR Navigation Aids

Browse

Simple Search

Advanced Search

 — Boolean

 — Proximity

 

Search History

Search Tips

Corrections

Latest Updates

User Info

FAQs

Agency List

Incorporation By Reference

eCFR logo

Related Resources

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations

We invite you to try out our new beta eCFR site at https://ecfr.federalregister.gov. We???ve made big changes to make the eCFR easier to use. Be sure to leave feedback using the Help button on the bottom right of each page!

e-CFR data is current as of August 6, 2020

Title 48Chapter 6Subchapter G → Part 649


Title 48: Federal Acquisition Regulations System


PART 649—TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS


Contents

Subpart 649.1—General Principles

649.101   Authorities and responsibilities.
649.101-70   Termination action decisions after debarment.
649.106   Fraud or other criminal conduct.
649.111   Review of proposed settlements.

Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and 48 CFR chapter 1.

Source: 59 FR 66767, Dec. 28, 1994, unless otherwise noted.

return arrow Back to Top

Subpart 649.1—General Principles

return arrow Back to Top

649.101   Authorities and responsibilities.

return arrow Back to Top

649.101-70   Termination action decisions after debarment.

(a) Prior to making a decision to terminate, based on the consideration listed below, the contracting officer shall have the proposed action reviewed and approved by:

(1) The Office of the Legal Adviser;

(2) An individual one level above the contracting officer; and

(3) For overseas posts, A/OPE.

(b) Termination for default. Termination for default under a contract's default clause is appropriate when the circumstances giving rise to the debarment or suspension also constitute a default in the contractor's performance of that contract. Debarment or suspension of the contractor for reasons unrelated to the performance of that contract may not support a termination for default.

(c) Termination for convenience or cancellation. Termination for convenience or cancellation under appropriate contract clauses should be considered when the contractor presents a significant risk to the Government in completing a current contract and when such termination for convenience or cancellation is determined to be in the Government's best interests. In making this determination, the contracting officer should consider such factors as the—

(1) Seriousness of the cause for debarment or suspension;

(2) Extent of contract performance;

(3) Potential costs to the Government;

(4) Urgency of the requirement and the impact of the delay; and/or

(5) Availability of other safeguards to protect the Government's interests.

[53 FR 26165, July 11, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 66756, Dec. 28, 1994. Redesignated at 81 FR 51125, Aug. 3, 2016]

return arrow Back to Top

649.106   Fraud or other criminal conduct.

If the Contracting Officer (CO) suspects fraud or other criminal conduct related to the settlement of a terminated contract, the CO shall discontinue negotiations and report the facts to the Office of the Inspector General.

[59 FR 66767, Dec. 28, 1994, as amended at 80 FR 6923, Feb. 9, 2015]

return arrow Back to Top

649.111   Review of proposed settlements.

All proposed termination settlements shall be reviewed and approved by the Office of the Legal Adviser for legal sufficiency. In addition,

(a) All proposed termination settlements from domestic contracting activities shall be approved by the head of the contracting activity, with the exception of termination settlements on simplified acquisitions and no-cost termination settlements; and,

(b) All proposed termination settlements from overseas contracting activities shall be approved by the Procurement Executive.

[80 FR 6924, Feb. 9, 2015]

return arrow Back to Top

Need assistance?