Electronic Code of Federal Regulations
We invite you to try out our new beta eCFR site at
https://ecfr.federalregister.gov. We have made big
changes to make the eCFR easier to use. Be sure to leave feedback using the Feedback button on the bottom
right of each page!
|
e-CFR data is current as of March 4, 2021 |
Title 47 → Chapter I → Subchapter B → Part 52 → Subpart E → Appendix |
Title 47: Telecommunication
PART 52—NUMBERING
Subpart E—Universal Dialing Code for National Suicide Prevention and Mental Health Crisis Hotline System
Appendix to Part 52—Deployment Schedule for Long-Term Database Methods for Local Number Portability
Implementation must be completed by the carriers in the relevant MSAs during the periods specified below:
| Phase I—10/1/97-3/31/98 | |
| Chicago, IL | 3 |
| Philadelphia, PA | 4 |
| Atlanta, GA | 8 |
| New York, NY | 2 |
| Los Angeles, CA | 1 |
| Houston, TX | 7 |
| Minneapolis, MN | 12 |
| Phase II—1/1/98-5/15/98 | |
| Detroit, MI | 6 |
| Cleveland, OH | 20 |
| Washington, DC | 5 |
| Baltimore, MD | 18 |
| Miami, FL | 24 |
| Fort Lauderdale, FL | 39 |
| Orlando, FL | 40 |
| Cincinnati, OH | 30 |
| Tampa, FL | 23 |
| Boston, MA | 9 |
| Riverside, CA | 10 |
| San Diego, CA | 14 |
| Dallas, TX | 11 |
| St. Louis, MO | 16 |
| Phoenix, AZ | 17 |
| Seattle, WA | 22 |
| Phase III—4/1/98-6/30/98 | |
| Indianapolis, IN | 34 |
| Milwaukee, WI | 35 |
| Columbus, OH | 38 |
| Pittsburgh, PA | 19 |
| Newark, NJ | 25 |
| Norfolk, VA | 32 |
| New Orleans, LA | 41 |
| Charlotte, NC | 43 |
| Greensboro, NC | 48 |
| Nashville, TN | 51 |
| Las Vegas, NV | 50 |
| Nassau, NY | 13 |
| Buffalo, NY | 44 |
| Orange Co, CA | 15 |
| Oakland, CA | 21 |
| San Francisco, CA | 29 |
| Rochester, NY | 49 |
| Kansas City, KS | 28 |
| Fort Worth, TX | 33 |
| Hartford, CT | 46 |
| Denver, CO | 26 |
| Portland, OR | 27 |
| Phase IV—7/1/98-9/30/98 | |
| Grand Rapids, MI | 56 |
| Dayton, OH | 61 |
| Akron, OH | 73 |
| Gary, IN | 80 |
| Bergen, NJ | 42 |
| Middlesex, NJ | 52 |
| Monmouth, NJ | 54 |
| Richmond, VA | 63 |
| Memphis, TN | 53 |
| Louisville, KY | 57 |
| Jacksonville, FL | 58 |
| Raleigh, NC | 59 |
| West Palm Beach, FL | 62 |
| Greenville, SC | 66 |
| Honolulu, HI | 65 |
| Providence, RI | 47 |
| Albany, NY | 64 |
| San Jose, CA | 31 |
| Sacramento, CA | 36 |
| Fresno, CA | 68 |
| San Antonio, TX | 37 |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 55 |
| Austin, TX | 60 |
| Salt Lake City, UT | 45 |
| Tucson, AZ | 71 |
| Phase V—10/1/98-12/31/98 | |
| Toledo, OH | 81 |
| Youngstown, OH | 85 |
| Ann Arbor, MI | 95 |
| Fort Wayne, IN | 100 |
| Scranton, PA | 78 |
| Allentown, PA | 82 |
| Harrisburg, PA | 83 |
| Jersey City, NJ | 88 |
| Wilmington, DE | 89 |
| Birmingham, AL | 67 |
| Knoxville, KY | 79 |
| Baton Rouge, LA | 87 |
| Charleston, SC | 92 |
| Sarasota, FL | 93 |
| Mobile, AL | 96 |
| Columbia, SC | 98 |
| Tulsa, OK | 70 |
| Syracuse, NY | 69 |
| Springfield, MA | 86 |
| Ventura, CA | 72 |
| Bakersfield, CA | 84 |
| Stockton, CA | 94 |
| Vallejo, CA | 99 |
| El Paso, TX | 74 |
| Little Rock, AR | 90 |
| Wichita, KS | 97 |
| New Haven, CT | 91 |
| Omaha, NE | 75 |
| Albuquerque, NM | 76 |
| Tacoma, WA | 77 |
[62 FR 18295, Apr. 15, 1997]