About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 
Home   |   Customers   |   Vendors   |   Libraries  

The Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) is a regularly updated, unofficial editorial compilation of CFR material and Federal Register amendments produced by the National Archives and Records Administration's Office of the Federal Register (OFR) and the Government Printing Office.

Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules for the Code of Federal Regulations and the United States Code
Text | PDF

Find, review, and submit comments on Federal rules that are open for comment and published in the Federal Register using Regulations.gov.

Purchase individual CFR titles from the U.S. Government Online Bookstore.

Find issues of the CFR (including issues prior to 1996) at a local Federal depository library.

[1]
 
 

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations

e-CFR Data is current as of October 21, 2014

Title 10Chapter IPart 51Subpart A → §51.51


Title 10: Energy
PART 51—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGULATIONS FOR DOMESTIC LICENSING AND RELATED REGULATORY FUNCTIONS
Subpart A—National Environmental Policy Act—Regulations Implementing Section 102(2)


§51.51   Uranium fuel cycle environmental data—Table S-3.

(a) Under §51.50, every environmental report prepared for the construction permit stage or early site permit stage or combined license stage of a light-water-cooled nuclear power reactor, and submitted on or after September 4, 1979, shall take Table S-3, Table of Uranium Fuel Cycle Environmental Data, as the basis for evaluating the contribution of the environmental effects of uranium mining and milling, the production of uranium hexafluoride, isotopic enrichment, fuel fabrication, reprocessing of irradiated fuel, transportation of radioactive materials and management of low-level wastes and high-level wastes related to uranium fuel cycle activities to the environmental costs of licensing the nuclear power reactor. Table S-3 shall be included in the environmental report and may be supplemented by a discussion of the environmental significance of the data set forth in the table as weighed in the analysis for the proposed facility.

(b) Table S-3.

Table S-3—Table of Uranium Fuel Cycle Environmental Data1

[Normalized to model LWR annual fuel requirement [WASH-1248] or reference reactor year [NUREG-0116]]

Environmental considerationsTotalMaximum effect per annual fuel requirement or reference reactor year of model 1,000 MWe LWR
Natural Resource Use
Land (acres):
Temporarily committed2100
Undisturbed area79
Disturbed area22Equivalent to a 110 MWe coal-fired power plant.
Permanently committed13
Overburden moved (millions of MT)2.8Equivalent to 95 MWe coal-fired power plant.
Water (millions of gallons):
Discharged to air160=2 percent of model 1,000 MWe LWR with cooling tower.
Discharged to water bodies11,090
Discharged to ground127
Total11,377<4 percent of model 1,000 MWe LWR with once-through cooling.
Fossil fuel:
Electrical energy (thousands of MW-hour)323<5 percent of model 1,000 MWe LWR output.
Equivalent coal (thousands of MT)118Equivalent to the consumption of a 45 MWe coal-fired power plant.
Natural gas (millions of scf)135<0.4 percent of model 1,000 MWe energy output.
Effluents—Chemical (MT)
Gases (including entrainment):3
SOX4,400
NOX41,190Equivalent to emissions from 45 MWe coal-fired plant for a year.
Hydrocarbons14
CO29.6
Particulates1,154
Other gases:
F.67Principally from UF6 production, enrichment, and reprocessing. Concentration within range of state standards—below level that has effects on human health.
HCl.014
Liquids:
SO4
NO3
Fluoride
Ca+
C1
Na+
NH3
Fe
9.9
25.8
12.9
5.4
8.5
12.1
10.0
.4
From enrichment, fuel fabrication, and reprocessing steps. Components that constitute a potential for adverse environmental effect are present in dilute concentrations and receive additional dilution by receiving bodies of water to levels below permissible standards. The constituents that require dilution and the flow of dilution water are: NH3—600 cfs., NO3—20 cfs., Fluoride—70 cfs.
Tailings solutions (thousands of MT)240From mills only—no significant effluents to environment.
Solids91,000Principally from mills—no significant effluents to environment.
Effluents—Radiological (curies)
Gases (including entrainment):
Rn-222Presently under reconsideration by the Commission.
Ra-226.02
Th-230.02
Uranium.034
Tritium (thousands)18.1
C-1424
Kr-85 (thousands)400
Ru-106.14Principally from fuel reprocessing plants.
I-1291.3
I-131.83
Tc-99Presently under consideration by the Commission.
Fission products and transuranics.203
Liquids:
Uranium and daughters2.1Principally from milling—included tailings liquor and returned to ground—no effluents; therefore, no effect on environment.
Ra-226.0034From UF6 production.
Th-230.0015
Th-234.01From fuel fabrication plants—concentration 10 percent of 10 CFR 20 for total processing 26 annual fuel requirements for model LWR.
Fission and activation products5.9×10−6
Solids (buried on site):
Other than high level (shallow)11,3009,100 Ci comes from low level reactor wastes and 1,500 Ci comes from reactor decontamination and decommissioning—buried at land burial facilities. 600 Ci comes from mills—included in tailings returned to ground. Approximately 60 Ci comes from conversion and spent fuel storage. No significant effluent to the environment.
TRU and HLW (deep)1.1×107Buried at Federal Repository.
Effluents—thermal (billions of British thermal units)4,063<5 percent of model 1,000 MWe LWR.
Transportation (person-rem):
Exposure of workers and general public2.5
Occupational exposure (person-rem)22.6From reprocessing and waste management.

1In some cases where no entry appears it is clear from the background documents that the matter was addressed and that, in effect, the Table should be read as if a specific zero entry had been made. However, there are other areas that are not addressed at all in the Table. Table S-3 does not include health effects from the effluents described in the Table, or estimates of releases of Radon-222 from the uranium fuel cycle or estimates of Technetium-99 released from waste management or reprocessing activities. These issues may be the subject of litigation in the individual licensing proceedings.

Data supporting this table are given in the “Environmental Survey of the Uranium Fuel Cycle,” WASH-1248, April 1974; the “Environmental Survey of the Reprocessing and Waste Management Portion of the LWR Fuel Cycle,” NUREG-0116 (Supp.1 to WASH-1248); the “Public Comments and Task Force Responses Regarding the Environmental Survey of the Reprocessing and Waste Management Portions of the LWR Fuel Cycle,” NUREG-0216 (Supp. 2 to WASH-1248); and in the record of the final rulemaking pertaining to Uranium Fuel Cycle Impacts from Spent Fuel Reprocessing and Radioactive Waste Management, Docket RM-50-3. The contributions from reprocessing, waste management and transportation of wastes are maximized for either of the two fuel cycles (uranium only and no recycle). The contribution from transportation excludes transportation of cold fuel to a reactor and of irradiated fuel and radioactive wastes from a reactor which are considered in Table S-4 of §51.20(g). The contributions from the other steps of the fuel cycle are given in columns A-E of Table S-3A of WASH-1248.

2The contributions to temporarily committed land from reprocessing are not prorated over 30 years, since the complete temporary impact accrues regardless of whether the plant services one reactor for one year or 57 reactors for 30 years.

3Estimated effluents based upon combustion of equivalent coal for power generation.

41.2 percent from natural gas use and process.

[49 FR 9381, Mar. 12, 1984; 49 FR 10922, Mar. 23, 1984, as amended at 67 FR 77652, Dec. 19, 2002; 72 FR 49512, Aug. 28, 2007]



For questions or comments regarding e-CFR editorial content, features, or design, email ecfr@nara.gov.
For questions concerning e-CFR programming and delivery issues, email webteam@gpo.gov.